Management: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
==== L1 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition ==== | ==== L1 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition ==== | ||
It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and | It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and department's capability to manage campaigns, business plans, projects, initiatives, and achieve business goals. It’s divided into two categories: | ||
* General Factors</br> | * General Factors</br> | ||
Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or | Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or department domain and the feasibility of their team's and/or department's technical knowledge, and the needed technical knowledge at a company level. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="font-weight:bold; text-align:center; font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important;;" | {| class="wikitable" style="font-weight:bold; text-align:center; font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important;;" | ||
Line 330: | Line 330: | ||
|Develops and formulates new solutions for existing business challenges. Possess great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. Can explain and has the ability to articulate the success factor. | |Develops and formulates new solutions for existing business challenges. Possess great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. Can explain and has the ability to articulate the success factor. | ||
|Plans and executes action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems and extends known solutions to new problems. | |Plans and executes action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems and extends known solutions to new problems. | ||
|Monitors and reports action plans for business challenges | |Monitors and reports department's action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems new problems due to outstanding ability to drill down issues. | ||
|Monitors and reports business challenges and ensures execution of action plans on an organizational level. Reflects on business anticipating new challenges and formulating new solutions. | |Monitors and reports business challenges and ensures execution of action plans on an organizational level. Reflects on business anticipating new challenges and formulating new solutions. | ||
|- style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial | |- style="font-size:11px; font-family:Arial | ||
Line 574: | Line 574: | ||
* Processes knowledge reside within individuals and have limited documentation | * Processes knowledge reside within individuals and have limited documentation | ||
| | | | ||
* Frequently focuses on teams and/or | * Frequently focuses on teams and/or department practices and processes. Analyzes established processes for the department and makes an effort to improve them. | ||
* Occasionally focuses on cross-department processes. Lacks the knowledge to promote accountability. | * Occasionally focuses on cross-department processes. Lacks the knowledge to promote accountability. | ||
* Reactively define new processes for his/her department. | * Reactively define new processes for his/her department. | ||
* Processes are documented with varying levels of understanding and basic tools in place. | * Processes are documented with varying levels of understanding and basic tools in place. | ||
| | | | ||
* Always focuses on teams and/or | * Always focuses on teams and/or department practices and processes ensuring they are well organized, are proactively proposed, and promote accountability within the teams/department. | ||
* Sets up cross-department processes that promote accountability. | * Sets up cross-department processes that promote accountability. | ||
* Models processes according to innovative and cost-effective tools. | * Models processes according to innovative and cost-effective tools. | ||
Line 589: | Line 589: | ||
| style="text-align:center; font-size:12px;" | Achievement / Performance | | style="text-align:center; font-size:12px;" | Achievement / Performance | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* Ensures the majority of processes are being followed through task delegation and communication with the teams/ | * Ensures the majority of processes are being followed through task delegation and communication with the teams/department. | ||
* Reviews tasks critically and ensures they’re appropriately sized and prioritized. | * Reviews tasks critically and ensures they’re appropriately sized and prioritized. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* Processes are followed and effectively communicated within the teams/ | * Processes are followed and effectively communicated within the teams/department. The teams/department exercise judgment within defined procedures and practices described in the RACI to determine appropriate action. | ||
* Ensures tasks are prioritized correctly, and that dependencies are noted within the teams/ | * Ensures tasks are prioritized correctly, and that dependencies are noted within the teams/department. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* Processes are followed and broadly analyzed by the teams/ | * Processes are followed and broadly analyzed by the teams/department for improvements. | ||
* Processes are fully aligned, understood, and managed proactively across the teams/ | * Processes are fully aligned, understood, and managed proactively across the teams/department and cross-department. | ||
* Ensures dependencies are noted at tasks and projects and well understood by the teams/ | * Ensures dependencies are noted at tasks and projects and well understood by the teams/department. | ||
* Works within the teams/ | * Works within the teams/department to foster a culture of priority setting and urgency in alignment with organizational strategy. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* The established processes are successfully followed by the teams/ | * The established processes are successfully followed by the teams/department, controlled, and reported. | ||
* Teams/ | * Teams/department are empowered, accountable, and capable of directly linking the processes and defining rules for executing them enabling the manager to focus more on people's management than process management. | ||
* Ensures cross-teams/ | * Ensures cross-teams/department dependencies are noted and well understood by all teams involved and other relevant stakeholders. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* The established processes are successfully followed by the teams/ | * The established processes are successfully followed by the teams/department, controlled, and reported. | ||
* The processes are constantly improved and flexible in cases of changes to cover all aspects of the department. | * The processes are constantly improved and flexible in cases of changes to cover all aspects of the department. | ||
* Identifies dependencies across the organization and works with other managers and ICs to resolve them before they become an issue, and installs preventative measures to mitigate repeat occurrences. | * Identifies dependencies across the organization and works with other managers and ICs to resolve them before they become an issue, and installs preventative measures to mitigate repeat occurrences. | ||
Line 614: | Line 614: | ||
* Identifies the need for certain ceremonies and does not structure them or doesn't identify needed ceremonies at all. | * Identifies the need for certain ceremonies and does not structure them or doesn't identify needed ceremonies at all. | ||
| | | | ||
* Understands their | * Understands their department's ceremonies and works with subordinates and other managers to resolve disagreements in a healthy manner. | ||
* Usually identifies the purpose and the needed stakeholders of ceremonies. Might lack knowledge and/or judgment regarding expectations and outcomes. | * Usually identifies the purpose and the needed stakeholders of ceremonies. Might lack knowledge and/or judgment regarding expectations and outcomes. | ||
* Structures ceremonies and communicates the desired outcomes based on | * Structures ceremonies and communicates the desired outcomes based on department's needs. | ||
* Fosters a culture where people are encouraged to share their opinions and function well across diverse groups. | * Fosters a culture where people are encouraged to share their opinions and function well across diverse groups. | ||
| | | | ||
* Builds ceremonies based on the needs of a variety of teams and departments/divisions. | * Builds ceremonies based on the needs of a variety of teams and departments/divisions. | ||
* Encourages the | * Encourages the department to openly share their opinions, integrates their point of view, and coaches them to contribute to discussions in a respectful manner. | ||
* Fosters a culture of clear, concise, effective, audience-oriented communication with other managers and subordinates. | * Fosters a culture of clear, concise, effective, audience-oriented communication with other managers and subordinates. | ||
* Effectively communicates cross-dependencies between projects and re-aligns the efforts through ceremonies to successfully achieve goals in different teams and | * Effectively communicates cross-dependencies between projects and re-aligns the efforts through ceremonies to successfully achieve goals in different teams and departments. | ||
| | | | ||
* The manager facilitates engagement between other managers, teams, and stakeholders to contribute to discussions in a respectful manner. | * The manager facilitates engagement between other managers, teams, and stakeholders to contribute to discussions in a respectful manner. | ||
* Improves and monitors the current needs of different teams and serves as an advisor in cross- | * Improves and monitors the current needs of different teams and serves as an advisor in cross-department ceremonies to accomplish business needs. | ||
* Influences, plans, and leads decisions in different teams. | * Influences, plans, and leads decisions in different teams. | ||
* Re-aligns ceremonies with business needs and communicates effectively on such changes. | * Re-aligns ceremonies with business needs and communicates effectively on such changes. | ||
Line 639: | Line 639: | ||
* Ceremonies are not followed and their importance is not understood. | * Ceremonies are not followed and their importance is not understood. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* Execute some ceremonies and | * Execute some ceremonies and try to bring some structure to them. department members are encouraged to openly share their opinions. | ||
* The | * The department understands the importance of effective communication in an audience-oriented way, in written and verbal form but does not implement it. | ||
* The manager conducts conversations based on organizational strategy and principles with | * The manager conducts conversations based on organizational strategy and principles with department members when appropriate to ensure alignment. | ||
* Managers and | * Managers and departments contribute to ceremonies in a respectful and non-biased manner. | ||
* Ceremonies' importance is understood by the | * Ceremonies' importance is understood by the department. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* Actively listens to others and ensures they are understood. Respects the time of the audience. | * Actively listens to others and ensures they are understood. Respects the time of the audience. | ||
* | * Department and teams have most ceremonies structured, and Managers are engaged in the execution of such ceremonies. Issues have defined action steps and are reviewed as a follow-up. | ||
* The right stakeholders are effectively involved for problem resolution through clear, concise communication in written and verbal form both technical and non-technical subjects and in an audience-oriented way. | * The right stakeholders are effectively involved for problem resolution through clear, concise communication in written and verbal form both technical and non-technical subjects and in an audience-oriented way. | ||
* The | * The department and teams are empowered to share concerns and action plans in an unbiased way and capable is of having conversations based on organizational strategy and principles to create alignment. | ||
* The teams have a shared understanding of the desired outcomes and are open to changing their perspective and plans based on others' input. | * The teams have a shared understanding of the desired outcomes and are open to changing their perspective and plans based on others' input. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* Most ceremonies are structured and executed and have complete documentation: follow-up actions, outcomes, objectives, and stakeholders' level of involvement. | * Most ceremonies are structured and executed and have complete documentation: follow-up actions, outcomes, objectives, and stakeholders' level of involvement. | ||
* The teams' disagreements are approached non-defensively, and contradictory opinions are used as a basis for constructive, productive conversations. | * The teams' disagreements are approached non-defensively, and contradictory opinions are used as a basis for constructive, productive conversations. | ||
* | * The communication is based on organizational strategy is assured. | ||
* Ceremonies are aligned with the business needs and promote innovation through unbiased, respectful discussions. | * Ceremonies are aligned with the business needs and promote innovation through unbiased, respectful discussions. | ||
* Teams and | * Teams and departments are successfully communicated regarding their impact on Secure Group's overall strategy and have the necessary context to achieve it. | ||
* Facilitates and inspires cross- | * Facilitates and inspires cross-department collaboration and collaboration with others departments. | ||
| style="font-size:12px;" | | | style="font-size:12px;" | | ||
* All necessary touchpoints are mapped and successfully executed with complete documentation. The participants are fully engaged throughout the process. | * All necessary touchpoints are mapped and successfully executed with complete documentation. The participants are fully engaged throughout the process. | ||
* Stakeholders are frequently communicated on their impact and understand their role and expected outcomes in the ceremonies. | * Stakeholders are frequently communicated on their impact and understand their role and expected outcomes in the ceremonies. | ||
* The team/ | * The team/department is known for a culture of clear, concise, effective, audience-oriented communication, ensuring all participants actively listen to others and are understood. | ||
* Ceremonies promote collaboration within | * Ceremonies promote collaboration within departments and teams. | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 713: | Line 713: | ||
==== L2 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition ==== | ==== L2 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition ==== | ||
It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and | It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and department's capability to manage campaigns, business plans, projects, initiatives, and achieve business goals. It’s divided into two categories: | ||
* General Factors</br> | * General Factors</br> | ||
Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or | Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or department domain and the feasibility of their team's and/or department's technical knowledge, and the needed technical knowledge at a company level. | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="font-weight:bold; text-align:center; font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important;;" | {| class="wikitable" style="font-weight:bold; text-align:center; font-size:11px; font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif !important;;" | ||
Line 938: | Line 938: | ||
| | | | ||
* Level & Step reviews are not done or are not structured according to SGMM rules. | * Level & Step reviews are not done or are not structured according to SGMM rules. | ||
* Manager is not aware of needed open positions to achieve the | * Manager is not aware of needed open positions to achieve the departments' objectives. | ||
* Knowledge-sharing is not encouraged. | * Knowledge-sharing is not encouraged. | ||
| | | | ||
* Evaluations are done according to SGMM rules. Identifies the | * Evaluations are done according to SGMM rules. Identifies the department's strengths in terms of knowledge and reports frequently on it. | ||
* Open positions in the | * Open positions in the department are mapped and with clear Responsibilities and Accountabilities and needed set of knowledge (KAI) | ||
| | | | ||
* Evaluations are done according to SGMM, and K-POCs are set up in the system with SMART goals. The manager possesses strong knowledge gap awareness and designs and implements knowledge-related initiatives to mitigate such gaps. | * Evaluations are done according to SGMM, and K-POCs are set up in the system with SMART goals. The manager possesses strong knowledge gap awareness and designs and implements knowledge-related initiatives to mitigate such gaps. | ||
* Open positions in the | * Open positions in the department are mapped and with clear Responsibilities and Accountabilities and needed set of knowledge (KAI) | ||
| | | | ||
* Evaluations are done according to SGMM rules. The manager constantly assesses and improves the KAI, communicates with the teams/ | * Evaluations are done according to SGMM rules. The manager constantly assesses and improves the KAI, communicates with the teams/department, and reports on it to senior management. | ||
* All subordinates have a clear K-POC with SMART goals set up in the system, and the manager frequently communicates with them regarding objectives achievement. Promotes a knowledge-sharing culture within the teams/ | * All subordinates have a clear K-POC with SMART goals set up in the system, and the manager frequently communicates with them regarding objectives achievement. Promotes a knowledge-sharing culture within the teams/department. | ||
* Open positions in the | * Open positions in the department are mapped and with clear Responsibilities and Accountabilities and the needed set of knowledge (KAI). The manager knows exactly what to test in each candidate in terms of knowledge and skills to fill in open positions | ||
| | | | ||
* Evaluations are done according to SGMM rules. Defines the team's/ | * Evaluations are done according to SGMM rules. Defines the team's/department competitive advantage based on knowledge and can extract the best out of every team/department member through coaching. | ||
* All subordinates have a clear K-POC with SMART goals set up in the system, and the manager frequently communicates with them regarding objectives achievement. Promotes a knowledge-sharing culture within the team/ | * All subordinates have a clear K-POC with SMART goals set up in the system, and the manager frequently communicates with them regarding objectives achievement. Promotes a knowledge-sharing culture within the team/department and cross-team/department. | ||
* Open positions in the | * Open positions in the department are mapped and with clear Responsibilities and Accountabilities and the needed set of knowledge (KAI). The manager knows exactly what to test in each candidate in terms of knowledge and skills to fill in open positions | ||
|- style="font-size:12px;" | |- style="font-size:12px;" | ||
| Achievement / Performance | | Achievement / Performance | ||
| | | | ||
* The Manager achieves Grade 2 in the overall Department KAI. | * The Manager achieves Grade 2 in the overall Department KAI. | ||
* Growth expectations are not clear to subordinates. The teams/ | * Growth expectations are not clear to subordinates. The teams/department understand the concept of the KAI but don’t understand what's expected of them in terms of knowledge development. | ||
* The teams/ | * The teams/department show a lack of progression and does not have set-up K-POCS. | ||
* Workforce planning is not done and hiring is on-demand (firefighting). | * Workforce planning is not done and hiring is on-demand (firefighting). | ||
| | | | ||
* The Manager achieves Grade 3 and 4 in the overall Department KAI. | * The Manager achieves Grade 3 and 4 in the overall Department KAI. | ||
* Subordinates are aware of what's needed to grow and the managers sometimes help their teammates overcome obstacles, resolve blockers, and complete work tasks. The teams/ | * Subordinates are aware of what's needed to grow and the managers sometimes help their teammates overcome obstacles, resolve blockers, and complete work tasks. The teams/department know, understand, and strive to develop the KAI of their roles. | ||
* The teams/ | * The teams/department share knowledge in a non-structured way. | ||
* Gives or shares credit where due when working on common projects with other managers. | * Gives or shares credit where due when working on common projects with other managers. | ||
* K-POCs are still solely the responsibility of the subordinates. The Manager doesn't act on them in order to help the achievement. | * K-POCs are still solely the responsibility of the subordinates. The Manager doesn't act on them in order to help the achievement. | ||
Line 971: | Line 971: | ||
* The Manager achieves Grade 3 and 4 in the overall Department KAI. | * The Manager achieves Grade 3 and 4 in the overall Department KAI. | ||
* Consistently helps their subordinates to overcome obstacles, resolve blockers, and complete work tasks. The teams are empowered to be constantly developing the KAI of their roles and knowledge sharing occurs in a structured way. | * Consistently helps their subordinates to overcome obstacles, resolve blockers, and complete work tasks. The teams are empowered to be constantly developing the KAI of their roles and knowledge sharing occurs in a structured way. | ||
* The teams/ | * The teams/department are held accountable for their performance | ||
* Gives or shares credit where due when working on common projects with other managers. | * Gives or shares credit where due when working on common projects with other managers. | ||
* Manager successfully guides employees for them to achieve their K-POCs so growth is constant in the | * Manager successfully guides employees for them to achieve their K-POCs so growth is constant in the department. | ||
* Desirable turnover occurs reactively: an employee whose performance falls below the company’s expectations is replaced by someone whose performance meets or exceeds expectations. | * Desirable turnover occurs reactively: an employee whose performance falls below the company’s expectations is replaced by someone whose performance meets or exceeds expectations. | ||
| | | | ||
* The Manager achieves Grade 5 in the overall Department KAI for Concepts. | * The Manager achieves Grade 5 in the overall Department KAI for Concepts. | ||
* The whole team/ | * The whole team/department has a successful record of leveling up and stepping up. | ||
* The Manager avoids stagnation through coaching and mentoring. | * The Manager avoids stagnation through coaching and mentoring. | ||
* Consistently works with other managers to support each other. Ensures that credit is shared and given where due. Knowledge sharing is structured, monitored, and measured | * Consistently works with other managers to support each other. Ensures that credit is shared and given where due. Knowledge sharing is structured, monitored, and measured | ||
Line 985: | Line 985: | ||
* The Manager achieves Grade 5 the overall Department KAI. | * The Manager achieves Grade 5 the overall Department KAI. | ||
* K-POCs cycle is constantly being achieved and the manager successfully communicates the progress, providing directions and context, and promoting a high-performance team. | * K-POCs cycle is constantly being achieved and the manager successfully communicates the progress, providing directions and context, and promoting a high-performance team. | ||
* Subordinates are empowered and responsible/accountable for their development plan. The teams/ | * Subordinates are empowered and responsible/accountable for their development plan. The teams/department are empowered to be constantly sharing knowledge in a structured way, the department's KAI is achieved in every role and the team's/department knowledge management strategy aids a competitive advantage to the business. | ||
* Consistently works across the organization to enable teams/ | * Consistently works across the organization to enable teams/department to support each other. Ensures that credit is shared and given where due. | ||
* The manager embraces turnover in terms of being capable of taking the best out of the employees while they are in the company and capable of managing employees leaving and coming in a healthy way. | * The manager embraces turnover in terms of being capable of taking the best out of the employees while they are in the company and capable of managing employees leaving and coming in a healthy way. | ||
* Hiring process has a track record of being successful due to correct role definition. | * Hiring process has a track record of being successful due to correct role definition. | ||
Line 1,008: | Line 1,008: | ||
* Doesn't observe the relationships between subordinates | * Doesn't observe the relationships between subordinates | ||
* Cannot recognize how people’s attention to one another can vary: supporting, thwarting, or listening | * Cannot recognize how people’s attention to one another can vary: supporting, thwarting, or listening | ||
* Doesn't | * Doesn't interpret data and behavioral patterns | ||
* No diagnosis ability | * No diagnosis ability | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,018: | Line 1,018: | ||
* Resists the instinct to react without analysis | * Resists the instinct to react without analysis | ||
* Defends what's being addressed by providing data | * Defends what's being addressed by providing data | ||
* Diagnosis ability within the teams/ | * Diagnosis ability within the teams/department | ||
| | | | ||
* Ability to get on the balcony | * Ability to get on the balcony | ||
* Capable of determining each stakeholder (promoters, detractors) | * Capable of determining each stakeholder (promoters, detractors) | ||
* Navigates well between the audience | * Navigates well between the audience | ||
* Diagnosis ability within various departments/ | * Diagnosis ability within various departments/department | ||
| | | | ||
* Diagnosis ability within the organization | * Diagnosis ability within the organization | ||
Line 1,039: | Line 1,039: | ||
'''Time''' - Identifies if the issue is routine or non-routine and occasionally acts at the required pace considering the consequences that are to come.</br> | '''Time''' - Identifies if the issue is routine or non-routine and occasionally acts at the required pace considering the consequences that are to come.</br> | ||
'''Object''' - Sufficiently understands how things are organized.</br> | '''Object''' - Sufficiently understands how things are organized.</br> | ||
'''People''' - Reads the people. Identifies their mood and body language. Reads between the lines and occasionally have the ability to navigate between different audiences within the teams/ | '''People''' - Reads the people. Identifies their mood and body language. Reads between the lines and occasionally have the ability to navigate between different audiences within the teams/department and sometimes in the organization. From time to time acts at the right pace and with the right language. | ||
| | | | ||
'''Space''' - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Consistently reacts to them accordingly.</br> | '''Space''' - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Consistently reacts to them accordingly.</br> | ||
'''Time''' - Identifies if the issue is routine or non-routine and consistently acts at the required pace considering the consequences that are to come.</br> | '''Time''' - Identifies if the issue is routine or non-routine and consistently acts at the required pace considering the consequences that are to come.</br> | ||
'''Object''' - Effectively understands how things are organized.</br> | '''Object''' - Effectively understands how things are organized.</br> | ||
'''People''' - Reads the people. Identifies their mood and body language. Reads between the lines and consistently have the ability to navigate between different audiences within the teams/ | '''People''' - Reads the people. Identifies their mood and body language. Reads between the lines and consistently have the ability to navigate between different audiences within the teams/department and sometimes in the organization. Consistently acts at the right pace and with the right language. | ||
| | | | ||
'''Space''' - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations and very often reacts to them accordingly.</br> | '''Space''' - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations and very often reacts to them accordingly.</br> | ||
Line 1,068: | Line 1,068: | ||
| | | | ||
* Identifies adaptive challenges | * Identifies adaptive challenges | ||
* Provides context and coaching for the whole team/ | * Provides context and coaching for the whole team/department to be able to balance the pros and cons | ||
|- style="font-size:12px;" | |- style="font-size:12px;" | ||
| rowspan="1" style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold;" | Regulate Distress | | rowspan="1" style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold;" | Regulate Distress | ||
| rowspan="1" style="text-align:center;" | Ability to enable employees to see the need for change, while ensuring they do not become overwhelmed by the change itself | | rowspan="1" style="text-align:center;" | Ability to enable employees to see the need for change, while ensuring they do not become overwhelmed by the change itself | ||
| | | | ||
* Doesn't regulate distress on the teams and other departments | * Doesn't regulate distress on the teams and other departments | ||
| | | | ||
* Regulates distress only when it's inside their comfort zone (meaning, they have enough knowledge to provide context) | * Regulates distress only when it's inside their comfort zone (meaning, they have enough knowledge to provide context) | ||
Line 1,083: | Line 1,083: | ||
* Conflict management | * Conflict management | ||
| | | | ||
* Regulates any distress in the teams/ | * Regulates any distress in the teams/department | ||
* Provides direction, protection, orientation, and productive norms | * Provides direction, protection, orientation, and productive norms | ||
* Regulates personal distress | * Regulates personal distress | ||
Line 1,096: | Line 1,096: | ||
| | | | ||
* Very often can reframe the issue, debate it, and break it into parts. | * Very often can reframe the issue, debate it, and break it into parts. | ||
* Communicates on it with the teams/ | * Communicates on it with the teams/department. | ||
| | | | ||
* Effectively ensures Task prioritization | * Effectively ensures Task prioritization | ||
Line 1,102: | Line 1,102: | ||
| | | | ||
* Provides relevant context | * Provides relevant context | ||
* Teams/ | * Teams/department understand priorities | ||
* Brings attention back to the issue | * Brings attention back to the issue | ||
* Effective and clear communication at all levels | * Effective and clear communication at all levels | ||
Line 1,116: | Line 1,116: | ||
* Practices walk the talk promoting best practices | * Practices walk the talk promoting best practices | ||
| | | | ||
* Starts empowering the teams/ | * Starts empowering the teams/department | ||
* Subordinates have a sense of understanding on what they should act or not at the moment but still struggle to find a way of doing so. | * Subordinates have a sense of understanding on what they should act or not at the moment but still struggle to find a way of doing so. | ||
| | | | ||
Line 1,125: | Line 1,125: | ||
|- style="font-size:12px;" | |- style="font-size:12px;" | ||
| style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-style:normal;" | Protect the voices from below | | style="text-align:center; font-weight:bold; font-style:normal;" | Protect the voices from below | ||
| style="text-align:center; font-style:normal;" | Ability to give voice to all people willing to experiment and learn. Incentives | | style="text-align:center; font-style:normal;" | Ability to give voice to all people willing to experiment and learn. Incentives original voices that routinely got discouraged or silenced in the organization even if they are not as articulate as one would wish. | ||
| | | | ||
* Doesn't encourage the teams/ | * Doesn't encourage the teams/department to share their opinion | ||
| | | | ||
* Encourages the teams/ | * Encourages the teams/department to share their opinion | ||
* Not always achieves the expected results | * Not always achieves the expected results | ||
| | | | ||
* Fosters a culture within their teams/ | * Fosters a culture within their teams/department where people are encouraged to share opinions. | ||
* Occasionally approaches disagreement non-defensively. | * Occasionally approaches disagreement non-defensively. | ||
| | | |
Revision as of 08:57, 7 January 2022
Levels & Steps
We currently have four Levels for our Management Path. Each one of the levels is expected to have different leadership traits as we explored in the chapter Leadership.
In the Management Path, there are also four steps per level that you can grow into. To move up from one step to the other it’s evaluated the authority and involvement regarding:
Level 1 - Our pace setters
L1 Technical Leadership
Technical Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
RACI | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ceremonies | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L1 Business Leadership
Level 1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Strategy | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L1 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition
It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and department's capability to manage campaigns, business plans, projects, initiatives, and achieve business goals. It’s divided into two categories:
- General Factors
Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or department domain and the feasibility of their team's and/or department's technical knowledge, and the needed technical knowledge at a company level.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic understanding of their team's overall domain, framework's Realm and SG strategic plan. Lacks understanding of his/her team's technical domain or does not possess the needed technical knowledge to succeed. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete understanding of framework's Realm and their team's domain, and how it contributes to the overall organization's strategy. Has a complete understanding of their team's technical domain but lacks judgment on how to apply technical skills on projects and when delegating tasks. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough understanding of framework's Realm and their team's overall domain, how it's built in the strategic map and how it contributes to overall business strategy. Has a thorough understanding of their team's technical domain and has a complete understanding of adjacent teams' technical domains. It’s capable of successfully delegate and evaluate tasks and cross-department projects. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business, including all department's technical domains, and how they co-relate to each other. |
- Internal Factors
The leaders' Secure Group Knowledge in terms of who we are as a company and what we offer.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a basic understanding of adjacent teams' business domains. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete organizational understanding of company’s business. Strong knowledge of adjacent teams' business domains. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a thorough understanding of adjacent teams' strategies and how they map to their team and interaction points. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business including all departments and teams domains. |
L1 Capability Assessment Scoring
Capability | Definition | Criteria | Score | Additional Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Incomplete | Manager has no strategic involvement due to incomplete approach | General Factors | 1 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 1 | |||
Initial | Manager's Strategic involvement is based on intuitive action - not organized, not explainable | General Factors | 1 or 2 | Scores 2 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 1 or 2 | |||
Managed | Manager is successfully working and communicating on department's strategy - proven record | General Factors | 2 or 3 | Scores 3 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 2 or 3 | |||
Defined | Manager is constantly working on department's and cross-department's succesfully communicating and providing strategic guidance | General Factors | 3 or 4 | Scores 4 in at least one critera |
Internal Factors | 3 or 4 | |||
Optimal | Manager works on organizational strategic matters and provides context at all levels | General Factors | 4 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 4 |
L1 Achievement: Opportunity Finding Definition
Opportunity Category | Definition |
---|---|
Experience | Knowledge that comes from on-the-job experiences and practical contact that equipped managers with the opportunity to discover and develop job-related skills, address challenges, and learn from their mistakes. |
Exposure | Ability to expose themselves to our challenges, level of market knowledge, ability to find and structure solutions to Secure Group problems, and ability to reinvent him/herself when facing role changes. |
L1 Opportunity Finding Scoring
Opportunity Category | Definition | Incomplete | Initial | Managed | Defined | Optimal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experience | Project & Task Complexity | Works on projects and campaigns of limited scope in their own department – does not demonstrate ability and knowledge to participate in cross-department initiatives. | Works on projects, campaigns, and initiatives of moderate scope, including cross-department initiatives. Lacks the understanding to notice dependencies. | Works on business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects of diverse scope in his/her department and cross-department promotes alignment and ensures dependencies are noticed. | Works on unique tasks, business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and cross-department projects. Ensures organizational alignment. | Works on business plans, initiatives, and projects that directly impact business success and investments. It’s accountable for organization-wide initiatives. |
Believability | He/she was involved in the successful execution of a project, campaign, or initiative. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals and have a great explanation of his/her approach when probed. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals. He/she is endorsed by senior employees or subject experts regarding execution success. | Possesses proven track of success and frequency on effectively managing business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects | Possess a proven track record of managing projects and business plans that have a company-wide impact. Constantly develops new skills and industry knowledge with the company’s best interest in mind and enables growth | |
Exposure | Problem-Solving | Explores and understands business challenges. Possesses the ability to apply solutions to known problems. Possesses great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. | Develops and formulates new solutions for existing business challenges. Possess great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. Can explain and has the ability to articulate the success factor. | Plans and executes action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems and extends known solutions to new problems. | Monitors and reports department's action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems new problems due to outstanding ability to drill down issues. | Monitors and reports business challenges and ensures execution of action plans on an organizational level. Reflects on business anticipating new challenges and formulating new solutions. |
Ability to reinvent him/herself | Does not find the skills and strengths to cope with fast needed changes and challenges (bounces back). | Possess the skills and strengths to cope with new challenges. Overcomes adversities without a clear action plan (disorganized growth due to lack of understanding of the new picture). | Understands the new picture and traces an action plan to conquer new challenges. Does it in a structured way. | Completely understands the new picture and traces action plans. Always overcomes adversities that come from fast changes and effectively manages new challenges using them as a tool for growth. | Taps into inner resources, skills, and strengths to constantly overcome adversities from fast changes. Always makes sense of past experiences, has a proven record of reinventing him/herself, and uses new challenges as a tool for growth. | |
Knowledge of External Factors | Does not possess market and industry knowledge. | Has a basic understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a complete understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the company’s industry, competitors' strategies, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the entire industry, competitors' strategies, market, business concepts, and technical concepts. | |
Opportunity Outlook | It’s aware of the importance of being exposed to business-related matters within the Realms that affect his/her role but stays passive regarding it. | Seeks business-related matters within the Realms of the framework and makes an effort to be exposed to them in order to acquire context. Understands that pain is part of the process. | Successfully exposes him/herself to business-related matters of the framework's Realms to acquire context. Reframes pain as a signal of improvement. | Consistently exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms and exercises proper judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Shows a proven record of trying, failing, and overcoming learning pains and challenges. | Always exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms. Exercises independent judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Leads internal efforts to provide such context to different audiences | |
Communication & Approach | Communication is ad-hoc and not structured. | Communication is conscious and partially structured. | Communication is open, with a fully defined and structured approach. | Communication is open with a fully defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences. | Communication is open, promotes effective collaboration, possesses a defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences from different levels of influence. | |
Risk Assessment | Performs ad-hoc risk assessment and depends primarily on individual capabilities (fire-fighting). | Performs structured risk assessment, mainly in silos, and is aware of the benefits it brings to the organization. | Performs goal-driven risk assessment. He/she is aware of the benefits and deploys them across the organization. | Risk assessment is built in the decision making and it’s quantitatively and qualitatively defined. | Risk assessment is incorporated into business planning and strategic thinking. It’s sustainable and englobes the areas of activity of all stakeholders. | |
Relationship Building | Works mostly on an operational level and thrives to understand what drives stakeholders (ad-hoc). | Demonstrates some misperceptions towards stakeholders but embraces the reality of existing business capabilities to drive the relationship. | Acts as a service provider focused on benefits for both Secure Group and stakeholders. Starts engaging them in strategic thinking. | Act as a trusted advisor. Promotes cooperation and innovation based on mutual respect and understanding of businesses. | Acts as a strategic partner. Manages and communicates shared goals for maximizing value. Shares risks and rewards with stakeholders. | |
Score | 1 | 1 and 2 | 2 and 3 | 3 and 4 | 4 |
L1 Capability Assessment & Opportunity Finding Matrix
L1 Career Management Leadership
Career Management Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Workforce Planning & Development |
Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L1 Adaptive Leadership
Adaptive Leadership | ||||||
Perspective | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Get on the Balcony | Ability to view the situation and the responses of participants from a mental “balcony”, from which one can see patterns, minimize one's own emotional responses and react (or not!) in ways that will help the other employees engage in the adaptive challenge. |
|
|
|
|
|
Space - Doesn't understand what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and cannot distinguish expected and unexpected situations. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Occasionally reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Consistently reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations and very often reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations, always reacting to them accordingly. | ||
Identify Adaptive Challenges | Ability to identify challenges that require people to learn new ways of doing things, change their attitudes, values, and norms, and adopt an experimental mindset. |
|
|
|
|
|
Regulate Distress | Ability to enable employees to see the need for change, while ensuring they do not become overwhelmed by the change itself |
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain disciplined attention | Ability to counteract any type of distraction that prevent people from dealing with the adaptive issue |
|
|
|
|
|
Give the work back to the people | Ability to place the work where it belongs, being willing to be part of the challenge rather than directing its solution by providing answers from a position of formal authority |
|
|
|
|
|
Protect the voices from below | Ability to give voice to all people willing to experiment and learn. Incentives original voices that routinely got discouraged or silenced in the organization even if they are not as articulate as one would wish. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 2 - Our coaches
L2 Technical Leadership
Technical Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
RACI | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ceremonies | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L2 Business Leadership
Level 2 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Strategy | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L2 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition
It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and department's capability to manage campaigns, business plans, projects, initiatives, and achieve business goals. It’s divided into two categories:
- General Factors
Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or department domain and the feasibility of their team's and/or department's technical knowledge, and the needed technical knowledge at a company level.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic understanding of their team's overall domain, framework's Realm and SG strategic plan. Lacks understanding of his/her team's technical domain or does not possess the needed technical knowledge to succeed. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete understanding of framework's Realm and their team's domain, and how it contributes to the overall organization's strategy. Has a complete understanding of their team's technical domain but lacks judgment on how to apply technical skills on projects and when delegating tasks. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough understanding of framework's Realm and their team's overall domain, how it's built in the strategic map and how it contributes to overall business strategy. Has a thorough understanding of their team's technical domain and has a complete understanding of adjacent teams' technical domains. It’s capable of successfully delegate and evaluate tasks and cross-department projects. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business, including all department's technical domains, and how they co-relate to each other. |
- Internal Factors
The leaders' Secure Group Knowledge in terms of who we are as a company and what we offer.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a basic understanding of adjacent teams' business domains. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete organizational understanding of company’s business. Strong knowledge of adjacent teams' business domains. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a thorough understanding of adjacent teams' strategies and how they map to their team and interaction points. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business including all departments and teams domains. |
L2 Capability Assessment Scoring
Capability | Definition | Criteria | Score | Additional Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Incomplete | Manager has no strategic involvement due to incomplete approach | General Factors | 1 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 1 | |||
Initial | Manager's Strategic involvement is based on intuitive action - not organized, not explainable | General Factors | 1 or 2 | Scores 2 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 1 or 2 | |||
Managed | Manager is successfully working and communicating on department's strategy - proven record | General Factors | 2 or 3 | Scores 3 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 2 or 3 | |||
Defined | Manager is constantly working on department's and cross-department's succesfully communicating and providing strategic guidance | General Factors | 3 or 4 | Scores 4 in at least one critera |
Internal Factors | 3 or 4 | |||
Optimal | Manager works on organizational strategic matters and provides context at all levels | General Factors | 4 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 4 |
L2 Achievement: Opportunity Finding Definition
Opportunity Category | Definition |
---|---|
Experience | Knowledge that comes from on-the-job experiences and practical contact that equipped managers with the opportunity to discover and develop job-related skills, address challenges, and learn from their mistakes. |
Exposure | Ability to expose themselves to our challenges, level of market knowledge, ability to find and structure solutions to Secure Group problems, and ability to reinvent him/herself when facing role changes. |
L2 Opportunity Finding Scoring
Opportunity Category | Definition | Incomplete | Initial | Managed | Defined | Optimal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experience | Project & Task Complexity | Works on projects and campaigns of limited scope in their own department – does not demonstrate ability and knowledge to participate in cross-department initiatives. | Works on projects, campaigns, and initiatives of moderate scope, including cross-department initiatives. Lacks the understanding to notice dependencies. | Works on business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects of diverse scope in his/her department and cross-department promotes alignment and ensures dependencies are noticed. | Works on unique tasks, business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and cross-department projects. Ensures organizational alignment. | Works on business plans, initiatives, and projects that directly impact business success and investments. It’s accountable for organization-wide initiatives. |
Believability | He/she was involved in the successful execution of a project, campaign, or initiative. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals and have a great explanation of his/her approach when probed. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals. He/she is endorsed by senior employees or subject experts regarding execution success. | Possesses proven track of success and frequency on effectively managing business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects | Possess a proven track record of managing projects and business plans that have a company-wide impact. Constantly develops new skills and industry knowledge with the company’s best interest in mind and enables growth | |
Exposure | Problem-Solving | Explores and understands business challenges. Possesses the ability to apply solutions to known problems. Possesses great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. | Develops and formulates new solutions for existing business challenges. Possess great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. Can explain and has the ability to articulate the success factor. | Plans and executes action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems and extends known solutions to new problems. | Monitors and reports action plans for business challenges on divisions/departments. Develops new solutions for known problems new problems due to outstanding ability to drill down issues. | Monitors and reports business challenges and ensures execution of action plans on an organizational level. Reflects on business anticipating new challenges and formulating new solutions. |
Ability to reinvent him/herself | Does not find the skills and strengths to cope with fast needed changes and challenges (bounces back). | Possess the skills and strengths to cope with new challenges. Overcomes adversities without a clear action plan (disorganized growth due to lack of understanding of the new picture). | Understands the new picture and traces an action plan to conquer new challenges. Does it in a structured way. | Completely understands the new picture and traces action plans. Always overcomes adversities that come from fast changes and effectively manages new challenges using them as a tool for growth. | Taps into inner resources, skills, and strengths to constantly overcome adversities from fast changes. Always makes sense of past experiences, has a proven record of reinventing him/herself, and uses new challenges as a tool for growth. | |
Knowledge of External Factors | Does not possess market and industry knowledge. | Has a basic understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a complete understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the company’s industry, competitors' strategies, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the entire industry, competitors' strategies, market, business concepts, and technical concepts. | |
Opportunity Outlook | It’s aware of the importance of being exposed to business-related matters within the Realms that affect his/her role but stays passive regarding it. | Seeks business-related matters within the Realms of the framework and makes an effort to be exposed to them in order to acquire context. Understands that pain is part of the process. | Successfully exposes him/herself to business-related matters of the framework's Realms to acquire context. Reframes pain as a signal of improvement. | Consistently exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms and exercises proper judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Shows a proven record of trying, failing, and overcoming learning pains and challenges. | Always exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms. Exercises independent judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Leads internal efforts to provide such context to different audiences | |
Communication & Approach | Communication is ad-hoc and not structured. | Communication is conscious and partially structured. | Communication is open, with a fully defined and structured approach. | Communication is open with a fully defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences. | Communication is open, promotes effective collaboration, possesses a defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences from different levels of influence. | |
Risk Assessment | Performs ad-hoc risk assessment and depends primarily on individual capabilities (fire-fighting). | Performs structured risk assessment, mainly in silos, and is aware of the benefits it brings to the organization. | Performs goal-driven risk assessment. He/she is aware of the benefits and deploys them across the organization. | Risk assessment is built in the decision making and it’s quantitatively and qualitatively defined. | Risk assessment is incorporated into business planning and strategic thinking. It’s sustainable and englobes the areas of activity of all stakeholders. | |
Relationship Building | Works mostly on an operational level and thrives to understand what drives stakeholders (ad-hoc). | Demonstrates some misperceptions towards stakeholders but embraces the reality of existing business capabilities to drive the relationship. | Acts as a service provider focused on benefits for both Secure Group and stakeholders. Starts engaging them in strategic thinking. | Act as a trusted advisor. Promotes cooperation and innovation based on mutual respect and understanding of businesses. | Acts as a strategic partner. Manages and communicates shared goals for maximizing value. Shares risks and rewards with stakeholders. | |
Score | 1 | 1 and 2 | 2 and 3 | 3 and 4 | 4 |
L2 Capability Assessment & Opportunity Finding Matrix
L2 Career Management Leadership
Career Management Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Workforce Planning & Development |
Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L2 Adaptive Leadership
Adaptive Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Get on the Balcony | Ability to view the situation and the responses of participants from a mental “balcony”, from which one can see patterns, minimize one's own emotional responses and react (or not!) in ways that will help the other employees engage in the adaptive challenge. |
|
|
|
|
|
Space - Doesn't understand what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and cannot distinguish expected and unexpected situations. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Occasionally reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Consistently reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations and very often reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations, always reacting to them accordingly. | ||
Identify Adaptive Challenges | Ability to identify challenges that require people to learn new ways of doing things, change their attitudes, values, and norms, and adopt an experimental mindset. |
|
|
|
|
|
Regulate Distress | Ability to enable employees to see the need for change, while ensuring they do not become overwhelmed by the change itself |
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain disciplined attention | Ability to counteract any type of distraction that prevent people from dealing with the adaptive issue |
|
|
|
|
|
Give the work back to the people | Ability to place the work where it belongs, being willing to be part of the challenge rather than directing its solution by providing answers from a position of formal authority |
|
|
|
|
|
Protect the voices from below | Ability to give voice to all people willing to experiment and learn. Incentives original voices that routinely got discouraged or silenced in the organization even if they are not as articulate as one would wish. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 3 – Our visionaries and servant leaders
L3 Technical Leadership
Technical Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
RACI | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ceremonies | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L3 Business Leadership
Level 3 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Strategy | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L3 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition
It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and division's capability to manage campaigns, business plans, projects, initiatives, and achieve business goals. It’s divided into two categories:
- General Factors
Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or division domain and the feasibility of their team's and/or division's technical knowledge, and the needed technical knowledge at a company level.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic understanding of their team's overall domain, framework's Realm and SG strategic plan. Lacks understanding of his/her team's technical domain or does not possess the needed technical knowledge to succeed. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete understanding of framework's Realm and their team's domain, and how it contributes to the overall organization's strategy. Has a complete understanding of their team's technical domain but lacks judgment on how to apply technical skills on projects and when delegating tasks. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough understanding of framework's Realm and their team's overall domain, how it's built in the strategic map and how it contributes to overall business strategy. Has a thorough understanding of their team's technical domain and has a complete understanding of adjacent teams' technical domains. It’s capable of successfully delegate and evaluate tasks and cross-department projects. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business, including all department's technical domains, and how they co-relate to each other. |
- Internal Factors
The leaders' Secure Group Knowledge in terms of who we are as a company and what we offer.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a basic understanding of adjacent teams' business domains. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete organizational understanding of company’s business. Strong knowledge of adjacent teams' business domains. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a thorough understanding of adjacent teams' strategies and how they map to their team and interaction points. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business including all departments and teams domains. |
L3 Capability Assessment Scoring
Capability | Definition | Criteria | Score | Additional Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Incomplete | Manager has no strategic involvement due to incomplete approach | General Factors | 1 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 1 | |||
Initial | Manager's Strategic involvement is based on intuitive action - not organized, not explainable | General Factors | 1 or 2 | Scores 2 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 1 or 2 | |||
Managed | Manager is successfully working and communicating on department's strategy - proven record | General Factors | 2 or 3 | Scores 3 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 2 or 3 | |||
Defined | Manager is constantly working on department's and cross-department's succesfully communicating and providing strategic guidance | General Factors | 3 or 4 | Scores 4 in at least one critera |
Internal Factors | 3 or 4 | |||
Optimal | Manager works on organizational strategic matters and provides context at all levels | General Factors | 4 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 4 |
L3 Achievement: Opportunity Finding Definition
Opportunity Category | Definition |
---|---|
Experience | Knowledge that comes from on-the-job experiences and practical contact that equipped managers with the opportunity to discover and develop job-related skills, address challenges, and learn from their mistakes. |
Exposure | Ability to expose themselves to our challenges, level of market knowledge, ability to find and structure solutions to Secure Group problems, and ability to reinvent him/herself when facing role changes. |
L3 Opportunity Finding Scoring
Opportunity Category | Definition | Incomplete | Initial | Managed | Defined | Optimal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experience | Project & Task Complexity | Works on projects and campaigns of limited scope in their own department – does not demonstrate ability and knowledge to participate in cross-department initiatives. | Works on projects, campaigns, and initiatives of moderate scope, including cross-department initiatives. Lacks the understanding to notice dependencies. | Works on business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects of diverse scope in his/her department and cross-department promotes alignment and ensures dependencies are noticed. | Works on unique tasks, business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and cross-department projects. Ensures organizational alignment. | Works on business plans, initiatives, and projects that directly impact business success and investments. It’s accountable for organization-wide initiatives. |
Believability | He/she was involved in the successful execution of a project, campaign, or initiative. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals and have a great explanation of his/her approach when probed. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals. He/she is endorsed by senior employees or subject experts regarding execution success. | Possesses proven track of success and frequency on effectively managing business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects | Possess a proven track record of managing projects and business plans that have a company-wide impact. Constantly develops new skills and industry knowledge with the company’s best interest in mind and enables growth | |
Exposure | Problem-Solving | Explores and understands business challenges. Possesses the ability to apply solutions to known problems. Possesses great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. | Develops and formulates new solutions for existing business challenges. Possess great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. Can explain and has the ability to articulate the success factor. | Plans and executes action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems and extends known solutions to new problems. | Monitors and reports action plans for business challenges on divisions/departments. Develops new solutions for known problems new problems due to outstanding ability to drill down issues. | Monitors and reports business challenges and ensures execution of action plans on an organizational level. Reflects on business anticipating new challenges and formulating new solutions. |
Ability to reinvent him/herself | Does not find the skills and strengths to cope with fast needed changes and challenges (bounces back). | Possess the skills and strengths to cope with new challenges. Overcomes adversities without a clear action plan (disorganized growth due to lack of understanding of the new picture). | Understands the new picture and traces an action plan to conquer new challenges. Does it in a structured way. | Completely understands the new picture and traces action plans. Always overcomes adversities that come from fast changes and effectively manages new challenges using them as a tool for growth. | Taps into inner resources, skills, and strengths to constantly overcome adversities from fast changes. Always makes sense of past experiences, has a proven record of reinventing him/herself, and uses new challenges as a tool for growth. | |
Knowledge of External Factors | Does not possess market and industry knowledge. | Has a basic understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a complete understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the company’s industry, competitors' strategies, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the entire industry, competitors' strategies, market, business concepts, and technical concepts. | |
Opportunity Outlook | It’s aware of the importance of being exposed to business-related matters within the Realms that affect his/her role but stays passive regarding it. | Seeks business-related matters within the Realms of the framework and makes an effort to be exposed to them in order to acquire context. Understands that pain is part of the process. | Successfully exposes him/herself to business-related matters of the framework's Realms to acquire context. Reframes pain as a signal of improvement. | Consistently exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms and exercises proper judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Shows a proven record of trying, failing, and overcoming learning pains and challenges. | Always exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms. Exercises independent judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Leads internal efforts to provide such context to different audiences | |
Communication & Approach | Communication is ad-hoc and not structured. | Communication is conscious and partially structured. | Communication is open, with a fully defined and structured approach. | Communication is open with a fully defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences. | Communication is open, promotes effective collaboration, possesses a defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences from different levels of influence. | |
Risk Assessment | Performs ad-hoc risk assessment and depends primarily on individual capabilities (fire-fighting). | Performs structured risk assessment, mainly in silos, and is aware of the benefits it brings to the organization. | Performs goal-driven risk assessment. He/she is aware of the benefits and deploys them across the organization. | Risk assessment is built in the decision making and it’s quantitatively and qualitatively defined. | Risk assessment is incorporated into business planning and strategic thinking. It’s sustainable and englobes the areas of activity of all stakeholders. | |
Relationship Building | Works mostly on an operational level and thrives to understand what drives stakeholders (ad-hoc). | Demonstrates some misperceptions towards stakeholders but embraces the reality of existing business capabilities to drive the relationship. | Acts as a service provider focused on benefits for both Secure Group and stakeholders. Starts engaging them in strategic thinking. | Act as a trusted advisor. Promotes cooperation and innovation based on mutual respect and understanding of businesses. | Acts as a strategic partner. Manages and communicates shared goals for maximizing value. Shares risks and rewards with stakeholders. | |
Score | 1 | 1 and 2 | 2 and 3 | 3 and 4 | 4 |
L3 Capability Assessment & Opportunity Finding Matrix
L3 Career Management Leadership
Career Management Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Workforce Planning & Development |
Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L3 Adaptive Leadership
Adaptive Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Get on the Balcony | Ability to view the situation and the responses of participants from a mental “balcony”, from which one can see patterns, minimize one's own emotional responses and react (or not!) in ways that will help the other employees engage in the adaptive challenge. |
|
|
|
|
|
Space - Doesn't understand what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and cannot distinguish expected and unexpected situations. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Occasionally reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Consistently reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations and very often reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations, always reacting to them accordingly. | ||
Identify Adaptive Challenges | Ability to identify challenges that require people to learn new ways of doing things, change their attitudes, values, and norms, and adopt an experimental mindset. |
|
|
|
|
|
Regulate Distress | Ability to enable employees to see the need for change, while ensuring they do not become overwhelmed by the change itself |
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain disciplined attention | Ability to counteract any type of distraction that prevent people from dealing with the adaptive issue |
|
|
|
|
|
Give the work back to the people | Ability to place the work where it belongs, being willing to be part of the challenge rather than directing its solution by providing answers from a position of formal authority |
|
|
|
|
|
Protect the voices from below | Ability to give voice to all people willing to experiment and learn. Incentives original voices that routinely got discouraged or silenced in the organization even if they are not as articulate as one would wish. |
|
|
|
|
|
Level 4 – Our transformational leaders
L4 Technical Leadership
Technical Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
RACI | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
| |
Ceremonies | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L4 Business Leadership
Level 4 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Business Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Strategy | Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
|
|
L4 Achievement: Capability Assessment Definition
It’s defined by the likelihood of success and execution of strategy based on capability management and understanding. That refers to leaders’ ability to excel in their core duties based on effectively assessing their team's and division's capability to manage campaigns, business plans, projects, initiatives, and achieve business goals. It’s divided into two categories:
- General Factors
Owning the technical knowledge needed for the role, understanding the team's and/or division domain and the feasibility of their team's and/or division's technical knowledge, and the needed technical knowledge at a company level.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic understanding of their team's overall domain, framework's Realm and SG strategic plan. Lacks understanding of his/her team's technical domain or does not possess the needed technical knowledge to succeed. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete understanding of framework's Realm and their team's domain, and how it contributes to the overall organization's strategy. Has a complete understanding of their team's technical domain but lacks judgment on how to apply technical skills on projects and when delegating tasks. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough understanding of framework's Realm and their team's overall domain, how it's built in the strategic map and how it contributes to overall business strategy. Has a thorough understanding of their team's technical domain and has a complete understanding of adjacent teams' technical domains. It’s capable of successfully delegate and evaluate tasks and cross-department projects. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business, including all department's technical domains, and how they co-relate to each other. |
- Internal Factors
The leaders' Secure Group Knowledge in terms of who we are as a company and what we offer.
Score | Definition | |
---|---|---|
1 | Limited | Has a basic organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a basic understanding of adjacent teams' business domains. |
2 | Intermediate | Has a complete organizational understanding of company’s business. Strong knowledge of adjacent teams' business domains. |
3 | Experienced | Has a thorough organizational understanding of company’s business. Has a thorough understanding of adjacent teams' strategies and how they map to their team and interaction points. |
4 | Exceptional | Has a thorough understanding of the entire business including all departments and teams domains. |
L4 Capability Assessment Scoring
Capability | Definition | Criteria | Score | Additional Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Incomplete | Manager has no strategic involvement due to incomplete approach | General Factors | 1 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 1 | |||
Initial | Manager's Strategic involvement is based on intuitive action - not organized, not explainable | General Factors | 1 or 2 | Scores 2 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 1 or 2 | |||
Managed | Manager is successfully working and communicating on department's strategy - proven record | General Factors | 2 or 3 | Scores 3 in at least one criteria |
Internal Factors | 2 or 3 | |||
Defined | Manager is constantly working on department's and cross-department's succesfully communicating and providing strategic guidance | General Factors | 3 or 4 | Scores 4 in at least one critera |
Internal Factors | 3 or 4 | |||
Optimal | Manager works on organizational strategic matters and provides context at all levels | General Factors | 4 | N/A |
Internal Factors | 4 |
L4 Achievement: Opportunity Finding Definition
Opportunity Category | Definition |
---|---|
Experience | Knowledge that comes from on-the-job experiences and practical contact that equipped managers with the opportunity to discover and develop job-related skills, address challenges, and learn from their mistakes. |
Exposure | Ability to expose themselves to our challenges, level of market knowledge, ability to find and structure solutions to Secure Group problems, and ability to reinvent him/herself when facing role changes. |
L4 Opportunity Finding Scoring
Opportunity Category | Definition | Incomplete | Initial | Managed | Defined | Optimal |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experience | Project & Task Complexity | Works on projects and campaigns of limited scope in their own department – does not demonstrate ability and knowledge to participate in cross-department initiatives. | Works on projects, campaigns, and initiatives of moderate scope, including cross-department initiatives. Lacks the understanding to notice dependencies. | Works on business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects of diverse scope in his/her department and cross-department promotes alignment and ensures dependencies are noticed. | Works on unique tasks, business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and cross-department projects. Ensures organizational alignment. | Works on business plans, initiatives, and projects that directly impact business success and investments. It’s accountable for organization-wide initiatives. |
Believability | He/she was involved in the successful execution of a project, campaign, or initiative. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals and have a great explanation of his/her approach when probed. | Successfully managed some projects, campaigns, and initiatives achieving its major goals. He/she is endorsed by senior employees or subject experts regarding execution success. | Possesses proven track of success and frequency on effectively managing business plans, initiatives, campaigns, and projects | Possess a proven track record of managing projects and business plans that have a company-wide impact. Constantly develops new skills and industry knowledge with the company’s best interest in mind and enables growth | |
Exposure | Problem-Solving | Explores and understands business challenges. Possesses the ability to apply solutions to known problems. Possesses great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. | Develops and formulates new solutions for existing business challenges. Possess great reasoning of the cause-effect relationship regarding aspects of his/her project, campaign, or initiative. Can explain and has the ability to articulate the success factor. | Plans and executes action plans for business challenges. Develops new solutions for known problems and extends known solutions to new problems. | Monitors and reports action plans for business challenges on divisions/departments. Develops new solutions for known problems new problems due to outstanding ability to drill down issues. | Monitors and reports business challenges and ensures execution of action plans on an organizational level. Reflects on business anticipating new challenges and formulating new solutions. |
Ability to reinvent him/herself | Does not find the skills and strengths to cope with fast needed changes and challenges (bounces back). | Possess the skills and strengths to cope with new challenges. Overcomes adversities without a clear action plan (disorganized growth due to lack of understanding of the new picture). | Understands the new picture and traces an action plan to conquer new challenges. Does it in a structured way. | Completely understands the new picture and traces action plans. Always overcomes adversities that come from fast changes and effectively manages new challenges using them as a tool for growth. | Taps into inner resources, skills, and strengths to constantly overcome adversities from fast changes. Always makes sense of past experiences, has a proven record of reinventing him/herself, and uses new challenges as a tool for growth. | |
Knowledge of External Factors | Does not possess market and industry knowledge. | Has a basic understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a complete understanding of the company’s industry, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the company’s industry, competitors' strategies, and market space. | Has a thorough understanding of the entire industry, competitors' strategies, market, business concepts, and technical concepts. | |
Opportunity Outlook | It’s aware of the importance of being exposed to business-related matters within the Realms that affect his/her role but stays passive regarding it. | Seeks business-related matters within the Realms of the framework and makes an effort to be exposed to them in order to acquire context. Understands that pain is part of the process. | Successfully exposes him/herself to business-related matters of the framework's Realms to acquire context. Reframes pain as a signal of improvement. | Consistently exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms and exercises proper judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Shows a proven record of trying, failing, and overcoming learning pains and challenges. | Always exposes him/herself to business-related circumstances within the framework's Realms. Exercises independent judgment linking knowledge to Secure Group matters. Leads internal efforts to provide such context to different audiences | |
Communication & Approach | Communication is ad-hoc and not structured. | Communication is conscious and partially structured. | Communication is open, with a fully defined and structured approach. | Communication is open with a fully defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences. | Communication is open, promotes effective collaboration, possesses a defined and structured approach. Communication is adequate according to different audiences from different levels of influence. | |
Risk Assessment | Performs ad-hoc risk assessment and depends primarily on individual capabilities (fire-fighting). | Performs structured risk assessment, mainly in silos, and is aware of the benefits it brings to the organization. | Performs goal-driven risk assessment. He/she is aware of the benefits and deploys them across the organization. | Risk assessment is built in the decision making and it’s quantitatively and qualitatively defined. | Risk assessment is incorporated into business planning and strategic thinking. It’s sustainable and englobes the areas of activity of all stakeholders. | |
Relationship Building | Works mostly on an operational level and thrives to understand what drives stakeholders (ad-hoc). | Demonstrates some misperceptions towards stakeholders but embraces the reality of existing business capabilities to drive the relationship. | Acts as a service provider focused on benefits for both Secure Group and stakeholders. Starts engaging them in strategic thinking. | Act as a trusted advisor. Promotes cooperation and innovation based on mutual respect and understanding of businesses. | Acts as a strategic partner. Manages and communicates shared goals for maximizing value. Shares risks and rewards with stakeholders. | |
Score | 1 | 1 and 2 | 2 and 3 | 3 and 4 | 4 |
L4 Capability Assessment & Opportunity Finding Matrix
L4 Career Management Leadership
Career Management Leadership | ||||||
Criteria | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Workforce Planning & Development |
Completeness / Core Duties |
|
|
|
|
|
Achievement / Performance |
|
|
|
Leadership development is successful.
|
|
L4 Adaptive Leadership
Adaptive Leadership | ||||||
Perspective | Step A | Step 1 | Step 2 | Step 3 | Step 4 | |
Get on the Balcony | Ability to view the situation and the responses of participants from a mental “balcony”, from which one can see patterns, minimize one's own emotional responses and react (or not!) in ways that will help the other employees engage in the adaptive challenge. |
|
|
|
|
|
Space - Doesn't understand what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and cannot distinguish expected and unexpected situations. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Occasionally reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations. Consistently reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations and very often reacts to them accordingly. |
Space - Understands what's going on in the room/meeting/situation and can distinguish expected and unexpected situations, always reacting to them accordingly. | ||
Identify Adaptive Challenges | Ability to identify challenges that require people to learn new ways of doing things, change their attitudes, values, and norms, and adopt an experimental mindset. |
|
|
|
|
|
Regulate Distress | Ability to enable employees to see the need for change, while ensuring they do not become overwhelmed by the change itself |
|
|
|
|
|
Maintain disciplined attention | Ability to counteract any type of distraction that prevent people from dealing with the adaptive issue |
|
|
|
|
|
Give the work back to the people | Ability to place the work where it belongs, being willing to be part of the challenge rather than directing its solution by providing answers from a position of formal authority |
|
|
|
|
|
Protect the voices from below | Ability to give voice to all people willing to experiment and learn. Incentives original voices that routinely got discouraged or silenced in the organization even if they are not as articulate as one would wish. |
|
|
|
|
|
Key Concepts
Core Duties
- Level 1 managers are responsible for coordinating processes and stakeholders which means their main differentiator is Technical Leadership.
- Level 2 managers are responsible for their division's performance and people's growth so even though they have to focus on Career Leadership, their main differentiator is Business Leadership through experience and exposure.
- Level 2 Step 1 and Step 2 managers are still involved in the operation and execution of their department's processes while Level 2 Step 3 and Step 4 are responsible for process management on a higher level of report, design, automation, and monitoring.
- Level 3 managers are responsible for coaching and ensuring people's growth in more than one division/team which requires proficiency in Business Leadership but the way of achieving this high-performance mindset is through Adaptive Leadership and it's the main differentiator for the level.
- Level 4 managers focus on the organization's performance, growth, and alignment which means their main focus and differentiator is related to Organizational transformation.
Levels Rules - Hiring and Promotion
- To be hired or promoted as a Manager Level 3 and 4 you must have proven experience in the external factors capability category.
- You cannot be hired or promoted at a higher level than Level 2 Step 2 if you don't have proven experience in opportunity finding related to our business and/or industry. For Level & Step Reviews we will consider the experience acquired in our company and projects.
- You cannot be hired at a higher level than Level 2 Step 2 if you were not previously exposed to our market and/or type of technical and business challenges.
- For Business Leadership, if you score the Incomplete or Initial rating in Experience, it's mandatory to score Managed or higher in Exposure.