Level & Step Review: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
! style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold; font-size:22px;" | Evaluation | ! style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold; font-size:22px;" | Evaluation | ||
Line 92: | Line 91: | ||
|} | |} | ||
= Individual Contributors Performance Evaluation Framework Visualization = | = Individual Contributors Performance Evaluation Framework Visualization = |
Revision as of 14:55, 29 January 2020
Evaluation | When | Definition | Goal(s) | Process | Outcome(s) | Next Steps |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mid-probation Review | Three months after reviewee hire date | The Mid-probation Review verifies a new employee’s performance at the mid-probation point – confirming achievements and determining areas of improvement and possible additional coaching.
By providing relevant feedback and suggestions at the 3-month mark, the new employee is equipped with the direction to successfully complete the probation period according to his/her hiring Level. |
|
|
|
|
Probation Review | Two weeks before the end of the probation period (6 months after reviewee hire date) | The Probation Review verifies a new employee’s performance at the end of probation according to the Level he/she was hired – confirming achievements and determining areas of improvement and possible additional coaching. By providing relevant feedback and suggestions at the 6-month mark, the new employee is equipped with the tools to advance and share knowledge and skills, and the direction to successfully contribute to Secure Group's strategic goals and objectives. |
|
|
There are 3 possible outcomes for this Review:
|
|
Level & Step Review | Upon request | The Level & Step Review is an assessment that gauges an employee's performance as it relates to the execution of tasks, project roles and responsibilities, knowledge and skills advancement and sharing. The criterias of what's going to be evaluated is very well structured and transparent: |
|
|
There are 3 possible outcomes for this Review:
|
|
Peer Review | Upon request | It's an additional Review for the individuals following the Management Path. The assessment is completed by the manager's colleagues (Level 3 and UP), presenting an employee with constructive feedback regarding strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Carried out, along with the Level & Step Review for the Management Path, the Peer Review sheds additional insight into employee performance and paints a broader picture of the managers'development. |
|
|
The Peer Review generates insights for best management practices and feedback to be used in the Level & Step Review. | To complete the Level & Step Review. |
Strategic Contribution Review | Upon request | Analysis of an employee's contributions to Secure Group's strategic goals and objectives. The Strategic Contribution Review examines an employee's strategic initiatives, contributions with respect to company financial and operational measures, and task and project milestones. The format of this review is similar to Shark Tank.The Strategic Contribution Review is mandatory for employees following the Management Path and optional for the ones following the Individual Contributors Path. |
|
|
|
|