Performance: Difference between revisions

From Secure Group Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
|
|
*Do not necessarily want or have the right skills to manage people.  
*Do not necessarily want or have the right skills to manage people.  
* This path growth is focused on the development of technical skills.
* This path of growth is focused on the development of technical skills.
|  
|  
* Develop the skills for advising and leading people.
* Develop the skills for advising and leading people.
* Managers are also responsible for the teams’ performance evaluations
* Managers are also responsible for the teams’ and divisions' performance evaluations
|}
|}


Line 64: Line 64:
|  
|  
* End of probation review set
* End of probation review set
* Reviewee: To implement any improvements recommended in the [[#K-POC|K-POC]]
* Reviewee: To implement any recommended improvements
|-
|-
| style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold;" | Probation Review
| style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold;" | Probation Review
Line 73: Line 73:
* To provide relevant feedback and suggestions for improvement according to the related Level and Step.
* To provide relevant feedback and suggestions for improvement according to the related Level and Step.
|  
|  
* Reviewee: Completes self- assessment on Small Improvements and discusses results 1-on-1 with direct manager
* Reviewee: Completes self- assessment on Small Improvements: KAI Assessment based on the [[KAI]] of the framework and Level & Step Chart based on the employee's path and discusses results 1-on-1 with direct manager
* HR (if requested): Facilitates 1-on-1 and issues any documentation, if necessary
* HR (if requested): Facilitates 1-on-1 and issues any documentation, if necessary
* Direct Manager: Completes assessment on Small Improvements and discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee.
* Direct Manager: Completes the same assessment on Small Improvements and discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee.
|  
|  
There are 3 possible outcomes for this Review:
There are 3 possible outcomes for this Review:
Line 86: Line 86:
| style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold;" | Level & Step Review
| style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold;" | Level & Step Review
| style="text-align: center;" | Upon request
| style="text-align: center;" | Upon request
| The Level & Step Review is an assessment that gauges an employee's performance as it relates to the execution of tasks, project roles and responsibilities, knowledge and skills advancement and sharing. The criterias of what's going to be evaluated is very well structured and transparent:
| The Level & Step Review is an assessment that gauges an employee's performance as it relates to the execution of tasks, project roles and responsibilities, knowledge and skills advancement and sharing. The criteria of what's going to be evaluated is very well structured and transparent:
* For [[Performance#Individual_Contributors_Path|Individual Contributors Path]]
* For [[Performance#Individual_Contributors_Path|Individual Contributors Path]]
* For [[Performance#Management_Path|Managers Path]]
* For [[Performance#Management_Path|Managers Path]]
Line 92: Line 92:
* To assess an employee’s overall performance with respect to individual and team responsibilities, continuous learning and growth, and general conduct.
* To assess an employee’s overall performance with respect to individual and team responsibilities, continuous learning and growth, and general conduct.
|  
|  
* Reviewee (except those on probation / CAP): Completes self-assessment questionnaire on Small Improvements and discusses results 1-on-1 with direct manager
* Reviewee (except those on probation / [[Strategy#CAP|CAP]]) completes self- assessment on Small Improvements: KAI Assessment based on the [[KAI]] of the framework and Level & Step Chart based on the employee's path and discusses results 1-on-1 with direct manager
* HR (if requested): Facilitates Performance Review and issues formal documentation (if necessary)
* HR (if requested): Facilitates Performance Review and issues formal documentation (if necessary)
* Direct Manager: Completes a questionnaire with respect to the reviewee's operational performance and discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee
* Direct Manager: Completes a questionnaire with respect to the reviewee's operational performance and discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee
Line 115: Line 115:
|
|
* To complete the Level & Step Review.
* To complete the Level & Step Review.
|-
| style="text-align: center; font-weight:bold;" | Strategic Contribution Review
| style="text-align: center;" | Upon request
| Analysis of an employee's contributions to Secure Group's strategic goals and objectives. The Strategic Contribution Review examines an employee's strategic initiatives, contributions with respect to company financial and operational measures, and task and project milestones. The format of this review is similar to Shark Tank.The Strategic Contribution Review is mandatory for employees following the Management Path and optional for the ones following the Individual Contributors Path.
|
* To measure the scope and success of an employee’s contributions to Secure Group’s overall strategic goals and objectives
|
* Reviewee: Prepares and presents a record of strategic contribution and discusses results 1-on-1 with the direct manager
* Direct Manager & Management Team: evaluates reviewee's strategic contributions
* Direct Manager: Discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee
|
* Positive Strategic Contribution Review offers a potential biannual one-month salary bonus.
* Unfavorable Strategic Contribution Review generates no salary bonus and a [[#K-POC|K-POC]] focused in strategy.
|
* To implement any improvements recommended in K-POC or to start preparing for the next review.
|}
|}
<div class="center">
<div class="center">
<br/>
<br/>
== Performance Evaluation Framework Visualization ==
== Performance Evaluation Framework Visualization ==
<br/>
<br/>
[[File:Perf. Eval.jpg]]
[[File:Perf. Eval1.jpg]]
<div class="center">
<div class="center">
= K-POC =
= K-POC =
   <div class="box-content">
   <div class="box-content">
Line 146: Line 133:


= Management Model Golden Rules =
= Management Model Golden Rules =
'''On Progression or Stagnation in the Framework''':</br>
 
Level and Step Reviews can be requested at any time, but we require that employees undergo at least one evaluation per year. Any less than that is unacceptable.
Our Management Model has some Golden Rules to ensure high-performance of our people. You can check them all [[Golden Rules|HERE]]
* If you start at Secure Group as a Level 1 or 2, you will have one year to Level UP.
* If you start at Secure Group as a Level 3, 4, 5 or 6, you will have one year to at least Step UP.
* If you are an average performer (defined as having 2 failed K-POCS in a row) we will pay you a 4-month salary to let you go.
</br>
'''On the assigned Level upon hiring:'''
* You can apply for positions that are a maximum of one Level UP from your assigned Level.  
* If you do not meet the expectations of the Level you were assigned upon hiring, there are two possible outcomes:</br>
** We make you an offer at the salary of your Level and you will get a K-POC with clear instructions on how to Level UP in the months ahead.</br>
** You can refuse and we will let you go.</br>
</br>
'''On Salary increase based on the market'''</br>
* If your Framework had an increase based on the market, in your next evaluation we will re-adjust your salary according to the new Salary Grid. We expect you to step up one in this scenario.
</br>
'''On choosing the Path'''</br>
When choosing a path or when you wish to change frameworks there are 3 criteria to be followed:</br>
* Job has to be big enough: meaning, is there the need of a person with your seniority for the role at that moment?
* You have to be a superstar in your current role
* You have to be an ambassador of our Management Model
</br>
We believe the incredible performance of the right people deserves unlimited opportunities to grow and that high performance deserves high compensation.

Latest revision as of 15:30, 30 July 2021

Providing a concrete and clear development path that leads to a secure and trustworthy environment where innovation can thrive.

We want our employees to:

  • Be productive (to deliver value quickly)
  • Be autonomous (to drive outcomes)
  • Be inspired and motivated (to create and thrive)
  • Be psychologically safe (to experiment and fail without feeling vulnerable)
  • Be constantly growing (to achieve mastery)


That's why, we decided to create a development path that would align with our culture, would work for employees from diverse backgrounds, at all levels of experience, and in many different (some unique) roles.

Because we are an IT knowledge-driven company, the brain of our employees is our biggest asset. To maintain our High-Performance Culture we take decisive steps not to recruit or retain employees with average performance.

We believe: The incredible performance of the right people deserves unlimited opportunities to grow.

Paths

We designed two growth paths you can follow:

Individual Contributors Path Management Path
  • Do not necessarily want or have the right skills to manage people.
  • This path of growth is focused on the development of technical skills.
  • Develop the skills for advising and leading people.
  • Managers are also responsible for the teams’ and divisions' performance evaluations

By default, all employees are hired as Individual Contributors unless specified otherwise. Whenever one employee reaches Level 3, he/she can show interest in following the Management Path. Whatever path you choose, you have a clear direction for development, career growth, and monetary success.

Performance Evaluation

Evaluations are done on-demand. If you feel you are ready to Level Up or Step Up, you can request a Level & Step Review from your manager at any time you want. After the evaluation is completed, both the employee and manager will create a K-POC in our system. K-POC stands for Knowledge and Personal Objective Cycle and it explains the improvements you need to make before the next evaluation. The K-POC does not have an explicit timeline so once you complete your K-POC, you can request another review.

Performance Evaluation Framework

Evaluation When Definition Goal(s) Process Outcome(s) Next Steps
Mid-probation Review Three months after reviewee hire date The Mid-probation Review verifies a new employee’s performance at the mid-probation point – confirming achievements and determining areas of improvement and possible additional coaching.

By providing relevant feedback and suggestions at the 3-month mark, the new employee is equipped with the direction to successfully complete the probation period according to his/her hiring Level.

  • To determine whether employee performance is sufficient to successfully complete probation.
  • To provide relevant feedback and suggestions for improvements according to the Level and Step that he/she was hired.
  • A self-assessment is completed by the reviewee
  • A corresponding assessment is completed by reviewee's direct manager
  • 1-on-1 is held between reviewee and direct manager
  • Affirmation of reviewee strengths
  • Areas for reviewee improvement
  • A path toward the successful completion of probation
  • End of probation review set
  • Reviewee: To implement any recommended improvements
Probation Review Two weeks before the end of the probation period (6 months after reviewee hire date) The Probation Review verifies a new employee’s performance at the end of probation according to the Level he/she was hired – confirming achievements and determining areas of improvement and possible additional coaching. By providing relevant feedback and suggestions at the 6-month mark, the new employee is equipped with the tools to advance and share knowledge and skills, and the direction to successfully contribute to Secure Group's strategic goals and objectives.
  • To determine whether employee performance has been sufficient to complete probation
  • To provide relevant feedback and suggestions for improvement according to the related Level and Step.
  • Reviewee: Completes self- assessment on Small Improvements: KAI Assessment based on the KAI of the framework and Level & Step Chart based on the employee's path and discusses results 1-on-1 with direct manager
  • HR (if requested): Facilitates 1-on-1 and issues any documentation, if necessary
  • Direct Manager: Completes the same assessment on Small Improvements and discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee.

There are 3 possible outcomes for this Review:

  • The employee is adherent to the Level & Step that he was initially hired and in this case, the employee enters the regular flow for the next evaluations.
  • The employee doesn't meet the expectations of the Level & Step that he was initially hired. In these cases, most likely, we will not continue the employment contract.
  • The employee exceeds in meeting the expectations from the Level & Step he/she was hired. In this case, a new level and step will be assigned and the salary will be adjusted accordingly.
  • To implement any improvements recommended in the K-POC.
Level & Step Review Upon request The Level & Step Review is an assessment that gauges an employee's performance as it relates to the execution of tasks, project roles and responsibilities, knowledge and skills advancement and sharing. The criteria of what's going to be evaluated is very well structured and transparent:
  • To assess an employee’s overall performance with respect to individual and team responsibilities, continuous learning and growth, and general conduct.
  • Reviewee (except those on probation / CAP) completes self- assessment on Small Improvements: KAI Assessment based on the KAI of the framework and Level & Step Chart based on the employee's path and discusses results 1-on-1 with direct manager
  • HR (if requested): Facilitates Performance Review and issues formal documentation (if necessary)
  • Direct Manager: Completes a questionnaire with respect to the reviewee's operational performance and discusses results 1-on-1 with the reviewee

There are 3 possible outcomes for this Review:

  • The employee doesn't perform accordingly with the Level & Step that he/she is assigned in terms of skill inadequacy, roles, and responsibilities. In these cases, a K-POC is created with the employee in order for him/her to be responsible for making the determined changes until the next evaluation.
  • The employee meets the expectations of his/her current Level. A new Step may be assigned and the employee re-enters the regular flow for the next evaluations.
  • The employee succeeds in meeting the expectations from the Level & Step he/she is placed. In this case, a new level and step will be assigned and the salary will be adjusted accordingly.
  • To implement any improvements recommended the K-POC.
Peer Review Upon request It's an additional Review for the individuals following the Management Path. The assessment is completed by the manager's colleagues (Level 3 and UP), presenting an employee with constructive feedback regarding strengths, weaknesses, and areas for improvement. Carried out, along with the Level & Step Review for the Management Path, the Peer Review sheds additional insight into employee performance and paints a broader picture of the managers'development.
  • To provide an additional layer of insight into employee performance, as well as a broader overall picture to be evaluated in the Level & Step Review.
  • Peer Reviewer: Completes questionnaire, feedback on Small Improvements.
  • Direct Manager: Chooses peer reviewer(s) and communicates results during Level & Step Review.
  • The Peer Review generates insights for best management practices and feedback to be used in the Level & Step Review.
  • To complete the Level & Step Review.


Performance Evaluation Framework Visualization


K-POC

Management Model Golden Rules

Our Management Model has some Golden Rules to ensure high-performance of our people. You can check them all HERE